Neutrino yield
What do we expect to look for
Same script nu_yield.C as in the SHiP original study.
First study, mass 1 ton, size 40 x 40 square cm
Then, moved to mass 4.5 ton, size 40 x 80 square cm
The distance is considered with respect to the start of the main SHiP target, ship_geo.target.z0
with respect to the middle of SND target along z
Options under study
Check target configuration
The main parameters of this study are:
Transverse size (dx, dy);
Material density;
Total mass (which gives you volume from density and then, assuming a box shape, gives you dz);
Distance from proton target (see above)
Transverse size and distance are required for generate_neutrinos(), which propagates the fluxes to neutrino detectors and cuts away the ones outside acceptances;
Transverse size, mass and atomic number (material), are needed for nu_yield(), which computes the number of expected interactions for the different neutrino channels
Checking different neutrino sources
What are the sources?
3 different files:
no charm production, option 0;
only charm production, option 1;
with charm production, option 2 (ideally, should be the sum of the above);
If no option is provided, the total one (option 2) is used.
The code workflow is:
Create a link to /eos/experiment/ship/data/Mbias/background-prod-2018/pythia8_Geant4_1.0_withCharm_nu.root and to /eos/user/a/aiuliano/public/sims_FairShip/GenieEvents_SHIP/SplinesTungstenSHIP/nu_xsec_TungstenSHIP.root
Create an empty folder, called plots_2;
Launch generate_neutrinos() or generate_neutrinos(2);
Launch nu_yield() or nu_yield(2);
Normalize neutrino rates, initially 5e+13, to 2e+20 pot per target. From ECN3 onwards normalized per year, 4e+19 protons on target. SpreadSheet can help with that, but always check what you paste
Backup the output to EOS if needed.
Note: recently (2024) we added also the splines for Iron, due to the studies for implementation of AdvSND target in SHiP@ECN3
To do: check also the 10 GeV file, set links automatically in script
With respect to detector size
With the same mass, what changes with different transverse sizes?
Creating a folder for each configuration
With respect to detector angular position
Changing TX offset, telling us center position
Again, a folder for each configuration
Created a separate nu_yield_angles.C to check different angles
Neutrino Simulation
Since GENIE changed, I would need to redo the splines.
For now, still using old splines, and regenerating neutrino interactions with old GENIE.
After SHiP approval, modernization should be performed (See Oliver discussion)
Last updated
Was this helpful?